The Reshoring Movement in American Manufacturing

For decades, the United States watched its manufacturing base erode—chasing low-cost labor overseas and sacrificing industrial capacity in the process. Millions of middle-class jobs disappeared, once-thriving factory towns declined, and the country became increasingly dependent on fragile, far-flung supply chains.

Today, that trend is reversing.

The reshoring movement—bringing manufacturing back to American soil—is no longer just a talking point. It’s an accelerating transformation reshaping the U.S. economy, driven by global instability, national security concerns, consumer demand, and a surge of public and private investment.

Landmark legislation like the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, paired with strengthened Buy American rules, stricter tariffs, and a renewed emphasis on supply chain resilience, are redefining the economics of production. At the same time, a new generation of consumers is demanding transparency, accountability, and goods that align with their values.

In 2023 alone, companies announced over 287,000 reshored or nearshored jobs—the highest on record. Semiconductors, electric vehicles, clean energy, aerospace, and pharmaceuticals are leading the charge. From Arizona to Georgia, a new manufacturing geography is taking shape—supported by advanced automation, AI-driven supply chains, and a revitalized sense of national purpose.

But challenges remain. Labor shortages, infrastructure bottlenecks, cost pressures, and shifting politics could stall progress. Whether reshoring becomes a generational breakthrough or a missed opportunity will depend on the policies we pass, the systems we build, and the values we prioritize.

This report investigates the state of reshoring in America today—what’s working, what’s lagging, and what comes next in the fight to restore U.S. industrial leadership.

In a Nutshell

Reshoring is accelerating – Over 287,000 U.S. jobs were announced in 2023 alone, with nearly 2 million brought back since 2010.
Federal policy is fueling growth – The CHIPS Act, Inflation Reduction Act, and Buy American provisions are reshaping supply chains.
Strategic industries are leading – Semiconductors, EVs, clean energy, defense, and pharmaceuticals are at the forefront.
States are competing for projects – Georgia, Ohio, Arizona, and others are offering multi-billion-dollar incentive packages.
Technology is leveling the playing field – Automation, AI, and 3D printing are closing the cost gap and boosting productivity.
Consumer demand is rising – Millennials and Gen Z are driving interest in transparency and American-made goods.
Nearshoring complements reshoring – Mexico and Canada are playing growing roles in secure, regional supply chains.
Macroeconomic gains are real – Manufacturing jobs have rebounded to nearly 13 million, with local economies revitalizing across the South and Midwest.
Challenges remain – Labor shortages, permitting delays, and inconsistent trade policy could slow momentum.
Long-term success requires strategy – Workforce development, policy continuity, and supply chain rebuilding are essential for sustaining reshoring.

Why Is Reshoring Happening Now?

After decades of offshoring, a powerful reshoring wave is building across American industry. But this shift isn’t happening in a vacuum. It’s the result of converging global and domestic forces that have altered the risk-reward calculus for manufacturers.

Fragile Global Supply Chains

The COVID-19 pandemic served as a wake-up call. When global trade ground to a halt in 2020, companies that depended on far-flung suppliers—especially in China and Southeast Asia—faced severe shortages, production delays, and empty store shelves. These vulnerabilities exposed just how fragile and overextended global supply chains had become. From semiconductors to PPE to baby formula, the cost of dependence on offshore manufacturing became painfully clear.

Rising Geopolitical Tensions with China

Over the past five years, U.S.-China relations have deteriorated significantly. Trade wars, intellectual property theft, national security concerns, and supply chain chokepoints (such as rare earth minerals and pharmaceuticals) have made China an unreliable manufacturing partner. U.S. policymakers and business leaders alike are responding by decoupling critical industries and seeking domestic or allied production alternatives.

Federal Policy Incentives

Massive federal investments have added powerful tailwinds to the reshoring movement. The CHIPS and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law are injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into U.S. manufacturing. These laws include targeted tax credits, direct subsidies, and loan guarantees designed to bring back production in strategic sectors—from semiconductors and EV batteries to solar panels and biomanufacturing.

Escalating Overseas Costs

The once-overwhelming labor cost advantage of offshore locations like China and Vietnam is eroding. Wages in Asia are rising, and the cost of global shipping has become unpredictable—especially during times of geopolitical instability. When companies account for freight delays, tariffs, inventory risk, and quality control issues, reshoring often becomes cost-neutral—or even advantageous.

Consumer and Government Preference for “Made in USA”

Public trust in foreign-made products has declined, especially in areas tied to health, safety, and national security. At the same time, consumer demand for ethically produced, American-made goods is growing. The federal government has reinforced this trend with updated Buy American rules that prioritize domestic sourcing for federal procurement, creating added demand for U.S.-made inputs and products.

Technological Advancements Level the Playing Field

Automation, robotics, AI, and advanced manufacturing techniques like 3D printing are dramatically improving productivity in U.S. factories. These tools reduce the reliance on manual labor, lower operating costs, and allow companies to scale production efficiently at home. For many firms, these innovations make reshoring not just viable, but strategically smart.

The State of Reshoring: Data and Trends

After decades of decline, U.S. manufacturing is experiencing a meaningful revival—driven by reshoring and strategic foreign direct investment (FDI). While the trade deficit in manufactured goods still topped $1.2 trillion in 2022, there are promising signs that the tide is turning.

According to the Reshoring Initiative, nearly 2 million jobs have been brought back to the U.S. since 2010, with reshoring activity reaching record highs in 2022 and 2023. In 2023 alone, 287,000 jobs were announced from reshoring and FDI—up 11% from the year prior.

A major driver behind these gains is the surge in private-sector investment. Construction spending on U.S. manufacturing facilities soared 74% year-over-year by the end of 2023, with hundreds of billions of dollars flowing into factories for semiconductors, electric vehicles, and clean energy technologies.

Key reshoring trends include:

National Security-Driven Demand: Geopolitical instability and U.S.-China tensions have made domestic production a national priority.
Supply Chain Diversification: Businesses are rethinking offshore dependence after pandemic-era shortages.
Policy Incentives: Massive federal investments and Buy American mandates are changing the cost-benefit calculus for companies.
Technological Resilience: Automation and smart manufacturing tools are making reshoring more cost-competitive.

Though the U.S. still faces a significant goods trade imbalance, particularly with China, reshoring and nearshoring are gradually shifting the long-term trajectory. The numbers point to more than a short-term blip—they signal a strategic realignment of global manufacturing.

Industries Leading the Reshoring Movement

Reshoring isn’t happening evenly across all sectors. A handful of strategic industries—especially those tied to national security, innovation, and critical supply chains—are leading the charge.

Top reshoring sectors include:

Semiconductors: Boosted by the CHIPS and Science Act, companies like Intel, TSMC, and Micron are building advanced fabs in states like Arizona, Ohio, and Idaho.
Electric Vehicles & Batteries: Automakers, including Ford, GM, and Tesla, are reshoring EV production and partnering with battery firms like SK On and Panasonic to build U.S.-based gigafactories.
Aerospace & Defense: Defense contractors are prioritizing domestic sourcing in response to global tensions and Buy American mandates.
Pharmaceuticals & Medical Supplies: Post-COVID reforms and incentives are pushing companies to relocate drug and PPE production to the U.S.
Clean Energy Equipment: Solar panel, wind turbine, and hydrogen component makers are leveraging Inflation Reduction Act subsidies to onshore operations.

These sectors are capitalizing on government incentives and the strategic urgency to rebuild U.S. industrial capacity.

Where Reshoring Is Happening: Regional Hubs

The reshoring boom is creating new manufacturing corridors across the country—especially in regions that offer a combination of business incentives, workforce availability, and infrastructure readiness.

Key reshoring hotspots include:

The American South: States like Georgia, Tennessee, and Texas are attracting massive investment in EVs, batteries, and solar. Business-friendly regulations and cheap energy give them a competitive edge.
The Midwest: Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois are revitalizing their industrial base with semiconductor fabs, auto plants, and robotics hubs.
The Mountain West: Arizona and Utah are becoming semiconductor and advanced manufacturing magnets, supported by tech-friendly ecosystems.
The Northeast & Mid-Atlantic: Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland are seeing growth in biotech and clean tech thanks to strong university systems and federal grants.

Each region is competing to position itself as a reshoring leader, with infrastructure upgrades, tax credits, and workforce development programs playing key roles.

Reshoring in Action: Corporate Trends and Case Studies

Behind the headlines and policy shifts, the reshoring movement is being shaped on the ground by the decisions of private-sector manufacturers. From multinational tech giants to domestic industrial suppliers, more companies are bringing production closer to home, either directly through reshoring or strategically via nearshoring with trusted partners.

Who’s Reshoring—and Why

Companies are reshoring for a mix of reasons: supply chain control, national security compliance, labor cost stabilization, and growing demand for “Made in USA” products. While incentives help, many firms are also responding to shareholder pressure, customer expectations, and risk mitigation priorities.

Some of the most prominent reshoring moves include:

Intel – Investing up to $100 billion in a semiconductor mega-site in Ohio, one of the largest U.S. manufacturing investments in history. Driven by CHIPS Act subsidies and supply chain security concerns.
Apple – Working with partners like TSMC to establish chip production in Arizona; shifting some iPhone assembly to India and Vietnam for geopolitical risk hedging, but recommitting to U.S.-based silicon production for its most sensitive components.
General Motors & Ford – Reshoring electric vehicle (EV) and battery manufacturing to Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee, often in partnership with firms like LG Energy Solution or SK On.
Micron – Planning a $20–40 billion memory chip fab in New York State, backed by state and federal incentives.
GE Aerospace (formerly GE Aviation) – Expanding U.S. production of jet engines in response to defense priorities and rising global demand.
Amgen & Eli Lilly – Investing in U.S.-based pharmaceutical manufacturing campuses to mitigate global supply disruptions and comply with federal procurement requirements.

These investments signal a growing confidence in the long-term viability of domestic production, especially in sectors tied to national security or future growth industries.

The Rise of Nearshoring and “Friendshoring”

Not every company is moving production back to U.S. soil, but many are opting for nearshoring—relocating operations to allied countries like Mexico or Canada that offer geographic proximity and lower risk than China or Southeast Asia.

Tesla is building new operations in northern Mexico, taking advantage of USMCA trade benefits while reducing reliance on Asian suppliers.
Honeywell and Caterpillar are expanding facilities in Mexico to shorten supply chains while keeping costs in check.
U.S. textile and apparel brands like American Giant and Los Angeles Apparel are rebuilding North American supply chains with a blend of domestic and nearshore partners.

The broader trend, sometimes called “friendshoring,” is about building supply chain resilience by working with trusted nations, especially those with trade agreements, labor standards, and political alignment with U.S. interests.

Mixed Outcomes and Long-Term Outlook

While the trend is encouraging, not every reshoring project has gone smoothly. Some companies have delayed or scaled back commitments due to rising construction costs, permitting delays, or demand uncertainty. Others have reshored only final assembly while continuing to import upstream components, highlighting the need for deeper domestic supply chain development.

Still, the momentum is undeniable. According to the Reshoring Initiative, reshoring and foreign direct investment announcements in 2023 alone accounted for over 287,000 jobs—more than 50 times the annual average from the early 2000s. For many firms, reshoring is not just a patriotic gesture but a strategic business decision.

How Technology Is Powering the Reshoring Movement

For decades, the primary argument against reshoring U.S. manufacturing was simple: labor costs. But that equation is rapidly changing. Today, advances in manufacturing technology are closing the cost gap and creating new advantages for companies that choose to produce in America.

From factory floor automation to AI-driven logistics, technology is transforming how—and where—things are made.

Automation and Advanced Robotics

Modern U.S. factories increasingly rely on high-precision automation and robotics to improve productivity, reduce human error, and minimize reliance on manual labor. This shift helps offset higher wage structures while improving quality and consistency.

Collaborative robots (“cobots”) are now working alongside human operators to handle repetitive or dangerous tasks.
Industrial robotics systems are being deployed at scale in automotive, electronics, and food processing facilities.
The International Federation of Robotics ranks the U.S. among the top five countries for industrial robot installations—surpassing many low-cost nations.

This technology-driven approach doesn’t eliminate jobs—it redefines them. Demand is growing for mechatronics technicians, robotics programmers, and automation maintenance experts.

Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing)

Additive manufacturing is another reshoring enabler. 3D printing allows companies to:

Prototype faster
Customize small-batch production
Reduce tooling and setup costs
Manufacture complex components closer to the end customer

Industries from aerospace to medical devices are adopting this technology to localize production while improving design flexibility and speed to market.

Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins

AI is revolutionizing how factories operate. Through predictive maintenance, quality assurance, and real-time optimization, AI-powered systems reduce downtime and improve throughput.

Digital twins—virtual models of factories, machines, or supply chains—allow companies to test scenarios before implementing changes, improving efficiency and lowering risk.
AI also enables smart supply chain management, helping firms adjust more quickly to disruptions, a major driver of reshoring.

Data-Driven Manufacturing and IoT

Sensors embedded in machines and materials (Industrial Internet of Things, or IIoT) generate continuous streams of data. This helps manufacturers:

Track equipment performance
Monitor energy usage
Manage inventory in real time
Ensure traceability for regulatory and quality control

These tools provide the transparency and agility needed to operate lean, responsive production lines close to domestic customers.

Tech as a Talent Multiplier

While labor shortages are a major challenge for reshoring, technology can help ease the burden. By automating low-skill tasks and enabling remote diagnostics, manufacturers can do more with fewer people, while upgrading the skill level of available jobs.

States and companies investing in training programs focused on digital skills, robotics, and machine learning are positioning themselves to thrive in the next generation of American manufacturing.

Technology isn’t just enabling reshoring—it’s redefining it. The new American factory doesn’t look like the one that left in the 1990s. It’s leaner, smarter, and more resilient—powered by innovation and designed for long-term competitiveness.

The Role of Policy: How Washington Is Fueling the Movement

Over the past few years, U.S. federal policy has played a pivotal role in encouraging the reshoring of manufacturing. Legislation enacted during President Joe Biden’s administration, such as the CHIPS and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), provided substantial incentives for domestic manufacturing. However, with President Donald Trump’s return to office in January 2025, there have been significant shifts in policy direction, affecting the implementation and future of these initiatives.

CHIPS and Science Act

Signed into law in August 2022, the CHIPS and Science Act allocated approximately $52.7 billion to bolster U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and research. This included $39 billion in subsidies for chip production and $13 billion for research and workforce development. The Act aimed to reduce reliance on foreign semiconductor supply chains and enhance national security. Companies like Texas Instruments and Samsung announced substantial investments in U.S. facilities in response to the Act’s incentives.

Despite its bipartisan origins, President Trump has criticized the CHIPS Act, calling for its repeal and suggesting reallocating the funds to other priorities.

Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

Enacted in August 2022, the IRA represented the largest climate investment in U.S. history, with an estimated $369 billion allocated for clean energy initiatives through 2032. The Act extended and expanded tax credits for renewable energy, electric vehicles, and energy efficiency, aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote domestic manufacturing.

Under the Trump administration, several IRA programs have faced scrutiny and attempts at rollback. For instance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sought to halt grants from the $20 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, citing concerns over financial management. However, federal courts have intervened, blocking these efforts and emphasizing the legal obligations to implement congressionally authorized programs.

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)

Also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the IIJA was signed into law in November 2021, authorizing approximately $1.2 trillion for various infrastructure projects, including transportation, broadband, and energy systems. The Act aimed to modernize U.S. infrastructure and included provisions to strengthen domestic manufacturing through Buy American requirements.

In early 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order to pause the distribution of certain IIJA funds, seeking to reassess the programs’ alignment with its policy objectives. This action led to legal challenges, and in April 2025, a federal judge ruled that the administration could not indefinitely block funds authorized by Congress, ordering the release of billions of dollars for infrastructure and climate projects.

Buy American Provisions

The Biden administration implemented changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to strengthen Buy American requirements, increasing the domestic content threshold from 55% to 60% in 2022, with planned increases to 65% in 2024 and 75% by 2029.

The current administration’s stance on these provisions remains to be fully articulated. President Trump is a strong advocate for American manufacturing, though, and may further strengthen these requirements.

Trade Policy and Tariffs

Trade policy remains one of the most aggressive tools in the federal reshoring playbook, especially under administrations focused on economic nationalism. President Trump’s original Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports, imposed in 2018, remain largely in place in 2025. These tariffs, covering hundreds of billions in goods, have increased costs for offshore production and nudged companies to reconsider U.S.-based manufacturing.

While the Biden administration undertook a limited review of these tariffs, it stopped short of full repeal, largely due to bipartisan consensus around countering China’s economic practices. Now in his second term, President Trump has signaled he may expand tariff actions, potentially imposing new duties on imports from countries with persistent trade surpluses or lax labor standards. USTR policy reviews are reportedly underway to explore broader decoupling strategies.

Meanwhile, enforcement of anti-dumping and countervailing duties has ramped up. The Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC) continue to investigate cases of unfair trade practices in steel, aluminum, solar panels, and more, further bolstering domestic producers.

National Security and Critical Industries

Reshoring is no longer just about jobs—it’s a matter of national security. Both parties in Washington increasingly view domestic manufacturing as vital to defense readiness, public health, and economic sovereignty.

That urgency has translated into concrete policy:

Semiconductors are classified as critical infrastructure, with reshoring incentives tied directly to national security supply chain reviews.
Pharmaceuticals and medical supplies are being re-domesticated to avoid future pandemic-era shortages.
Rare earth minerals and strategic inputs are under active scrutiny, with funding for domestic extraction, processing, and recycling.
The Defense Production Act has been used repeatedly (by both Biden and Trump) to prioritize domestic sourcing of materials tied to national defense.

Think tanks like CSIS and government agencies including the Department of Defense and DHS have issued multiple reports linking supply chain resiliency to national resilience—embedding reshoring as a long-term strategic imperative.

How States Are Competing to Reshore Industry

While federal policy provides the broad framework for America’s reshoring momentum, the battle for manufacturing jobs is increasingly being fought at the state level. Governors, economic development offices, and local authorities are competing aggressively to attract new factories, supply chain facilities, and advanced manufacturing hubs—often with multi-billion-dollar incentive packages on the table.

Tax Breaks, Land Grants, and “Mega Deals”

States are offering generous incentive packages to lure major manufacturers. These often include:

Property and income tax abatements
Free or subsidized land and infrastructure development
Cash grants and job creation credits
Customized workforce training programs

Recent “mega deals” include:

Georgia’s $1.8 billion package for Hyundai’s EV plant near Savannah.
Ohio’s $2 billion incentive deal for Intel’s semiconductor fab near Columbus.
Kansas’ $1.2 billion package to secure Panasonic’s battery factory.
Texas’ multi-pronged incentives to support Tesla, Samsung, and a growing ecosystem of clean energy manufacturers.

These deals often draw scrutiny for their cost, but states argue they pay dividends through long-term job creation, increased tax revenue, and regional economic development.

Sun Belt and Rust Belt Lead the Pack

States in the Sun Belt—including Texas, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, and Arizona—have become top reshoring destinations thanks to:

Business-friendly regulations
Right-to-work laws
Ample land for large facilities
Reliable, low-cost energy

Meanwhile, Midwestern states like Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois are seeing a renaissance of industrial investment by leveraging:

Their manufacturing legacy
Deep supplier networks
Skilled labor force
Proximity to major markets and infrastructure

Even traditionally high-cost states like New York and California are competing by offering targeted grants and leveraging university partnerships in areas like semiconductors and biotech.

Workforce Development as a Competitive Edge

With over 600,000 open manufacturing jobs nationwide, states are doubling down on workforce training. Many are partnering with community colleges, technical schools, and industry consortia to offer:

Customized curricula aligned with employer needs
Apprenticeships and earn-while-you-learn programs
Fast-track certifications in automation, robotics, and welding

States that can build a skilled, ready-to-work labor force have a clear advantage in the reshoring race.

Intra-American Competition and Its Risks

The competition between states is fierce—and sometimes controversial. Critics argue that states are engaging in a “race to the bottom” by offering excessive subsidies with limited guarantees of long-term investment. Others warn that incentives can be revoked or clawed back if promised jobs fail to materialize, as seen in some past high-profile failures.

Still, the trend is clear: in the reshoring era, state-level policy is a major factor shaping where—and how fast—American manufacturing returns.

The Economic Impact: Jobs, Investment, and Regional Growth

The resurgence of American manufacturing isn’t just a policy win or a symbolic shift—it’s delivering measurable gains to the U.S. economy. While the full impact of reshoring will take years to fully unfold, early signs show a realignment in how and where economic value is being created.

Job Creation and Workforce Revitalization

According to the Reshoring Initiative, nearly 2 million U.S. jobs have been brought back since 2010 through reshoring and foreign direct investment (FDI)—with 287,000 jobs announced in 2023 alone, setting a new record.

As a result, total U.S. manufacturing employment has rebounded to nearly 13 million jobs, its highest level in over 15 years. These are not just numbers—they represent well-paying careers across assembly lines, engineering, logistics, and construction, many in communities previously left behind by globalization.

Capital Investment and Economic Multipliers

Reshoring projects often come with large-scale capital investments. Intel’s $100 billion semiconductor campus in Ohio and Hyundai’s $5.5 billion EV plant in Georgia are just two examples of projects generating long-term economic returns far beyond factory gates.

These investments create economic ripples:

Stimulating demand for domestic suppliers and subcontractors
Boosting state and local tax revenue
Supporting population growth through new housing, schools, and services

Some towns are transforming into next-generation manufacturing hubs, creating broader local economic ecosystems anchored by high-tech production.

Geographic Rebalancing

Reshoring is helping to reindustrialize regions that were hollowed out by decades of offshoring. States like Tennessee, Ohio, Georgia, and Arizona are emerging as industrial powerhouses—not just because of policy incentives, but because they offer the workforce, infrastructure, and logistics networks to support modern production.

This geographic spread is helping balance economic opportunity across regions, reducing over-concentration in coastal tech centers.

Trade Balance and Import Substitution

While the U.S. still faces a goods trade deficit exceeding $1.2 trillion, reshoring is beginning to chip away at import dependence in strategic sectors like:

Semiconductors
Electric vehicles and batteries
Pharmaceuticals and medical devices
Aerospace and defense

Bringing production home doesn’t just cut lead times—it also keeps more economic value within U.S. borders and builds resilience against global disruptions. Some economic gains are also supported by nearshoring to allies like Mexico and Canada, reinforcing North American integration without sacrificing security or reliability.

Productivity and Long-Term Growth Potential

Unlike the low-cost factories of decades past, today’s reshoring projects are technology-intensive and high-productivity. Automation, AI, and smart systems mean fewer but more skilled jobs—jobs that contribute more per worker to GDP and global competitiveness.

Over time, this shift positions the U.S. for:

Higher-value exports
Increased innovation and R&D
Stronger industrial independence in critical sectors

Reshoring is becoming a powerful engine of economic renewal. It’s not a silver bullet, but it’s delivering tangible results in jobs, investment, and national resilience. And with the right strategy, the U.S. can turn today’s reshoring boom into a long-term manufacturing renaissance.

The Challenges: What’s Still Holding Reshoring Back?

While reshoring is gaining momentum, it’s far from frictionless. Many of the same challenges that contributed to offshoring in the first place still exist—some more entrenched than ever. These obstacles are slowing the pace of reshoring and threatening the sustainability of recent gains.

Labor Shortages and Skills Gaps

U.S. manufacturers are facing a major workforce crunch. As of early 2025, more than 600,000 manufacturing jobs remain unfilled. Retirements are accelerating, younger workers are opting for other industries, and technical training pipelines haven’t kept pace with modern manufacturing needs.

Even in states with major reshoring projects, companies often struggle to find workers with the skills required for automation, precision machining, and mechatronics. The talent gap is especially severe in rural areas where many new factories are being built.

Higher Costs and Global Competition

While the cost gap between the U.S. and low-wage countries has narrowed, it hasn’t disappeared. Labor costs, environmental regulations, permitting delays, and litigation risks still make the U.S. a more expensive place to build and operate.

Many multinational companies continue to weigh these factors heavily—especially when federal or state incentives don’t fully offset the differences. China, Vietnam, and India continue to offer aggressive tax incentives, low wages, and expansive industrial zones.

Infrastructure and Permitting Bottlenecks

Manufacturers are often slowed down by aging infrastructure and bureaucratic red tape. In some regions, outdated roads, rail, and energy grids can’t meet the needs of high-tech factories. Delays in environmental permitting and zoning approvals can stretch for years, frustrating investors and project planners.

While federal infrastructure funding is starting to flow, its impact will take time to materialize on the ground.

Supply Chain Fragmentation

Reshoring a factory is only one piece of the puzzle. True supply chain resiliency requires rebuilding entire domestic ecosystems of suppliers, logistics, and service providers. In many industries, upstream components, raw materials, and machine tools are still overwhelmingly imported, creating choke points even after a facility is onshore.

This is especially true in sectors like pharmaceuticals, where precursors and active ingredients are still dominated by Chinese and Indian producers.

Inconsistent Policy and Political Uncertainty

Frequent changes in administration and shifting political priorities create uncertainty for long-term investors. Companies hesitate to make 10- or 20-year bets on U.S. production if they believe subsidies or trade protections could be reversed by future leadership.

Recent legal challenges to climate and manufacturing programs and growing calls to repeal major incentive packages underscore how volatile U.S. industrial policy remains.

The Future of Reshoring Policy: What Comes Next?

If reshoring is to become a permanent shift rather than a temporary spike, the U.S. needs to adopt a more strategic, coordinated approach. That means not just reacting to crises, but building a national manufacturing policy that can weather political changes and global headwinds.

A National Industrial Strategy

Unlike many of its global competitors, the U.S. still lacks a formal industrial strategy. While recent laws like the CHIPS Act are a step in that direction, they’re still fragmented and time-limited.

A more comprehensive approach would include:

Long-term funding for key sectors (e.g., semiconductors, clean energy, rare earths)
Permanent tax incentives for domestic production
A cabinet-level position dedicated to industrial policy

Workforce Development at Scale

To close the labor gap, the U.S. must overhaul how it trains and equips its manufacturing workforce. That includes:

Expanding trade and technical education at the high school level
Investing in community college programs aligned with industry needs
Scaling apprenticeship and earn-to-learn models
Providing relocation and housing support near major factory hubs

If the reshoring boom continues but the labor pipeline doesn’t, the movement will stall.

Permitting Reform and Infrastructure Modernization

Accelerating reshoring projects means cutting through bureaucratic red tape. Congress and the states should streamline permitting for industrial facilities, prioritize infrastructure upgrades in reshoring zones, and ensure utilities can handle the needs of advanced factories.

Some reforms—like fast-tracking clean energy projects or industrial clusters—already have bipartisan support.

Stable, Predictable Trade Policy

Whether tariffs are used as a defensive shield or a bargaining chip, companies need predictability. If trade policy continues to whipsaw every four years, many manufacturers will simply hedge their bets offshore.

A consistent strategy—clearly communicated and sustained across administrations—is essential to long-term planning and private-sector confidence.

Targeted Support for Domestic Supply Chains

Finally, reshoring incentives shouldn’t stop at the final assembly line. More targeted support is needed for upstream suppliers—such as machine shops, component makers, and raw material processors—who often lack the scale or capital to reshore without help.

Developing full supply chain clusters in key sectors (as Japan and South Korea have done) could multiply the impact of anchor investments like semiconductor fabs and battery plants.

Why Consumers Are Powering the Made in USA Movement

While government policy and corporate strategy play a critical role in reshoring, consumer demand is an equally important force. Across generations, Americans are showing renewed interest in products made on U.S. soil, driven by concerns over quality, ethics, sustainability, and economic sovereignty.

Public Trust in American-Made Goods

Surveys consistently show that American consumers associate “Made in USA” with higher quality, better labor practices, and safer materials. According to a 2023 Reshoring Institute study:

69% of U.S. consumers said they prefer products made in America.
83% said they would pay up to 20% more for American-made goods if they believed the product was of higher quality or helped create U.S. jobs.

Trust in domestic production has become a selling point, especially in categories like food, medical supplies, apparel, and electronics.

Generational Shifts: Gen Z and Millennials Lead the Way

Younger generations—often mislabeled as indifferent to economic patriotism—are actually among the most vocal supporters of supply chain transparency and ethical sourcing. Gen Z and millennials are:

More likely to research a brand’s sourcing and labor practices
More likely to pay a premium for sustainability and local production
More likely to distrust products tied to exploitative or unregulated overseas factories

For this audience, Made in USA often overlaps with other values: environmental stewardship, labor fairness, and corporate accountability.

The Push for Labeling Transparency

Reshoring’s momentum is also fueled by growing frustration with vague or misleading product labels. Consumers are increasingly skeptical of terms like “assembled in USA” or “designed in USA” when key components are still imported.

Advocacy groups, watchdogs, and independent retailers are pushing for:

Stronger enforcement of the FTC’s Made in USA labeling standards
More supply chain transparency tools (such as QR codes, origin maps, and blockchain verification)
Tighter rules around deceptive origin claims from companies exploiting legal loopholes

This aligns closely with the movement to decouple from countries like China, as many consumers now demand to know not just where a product was made, but also how and by whom.

Consumer Behavior as Economic Signal

Ultimately, reshoring isn’t just a policy shift—it’s a values shift. Every purchase sends a message, and the growing preference for domestically made goods has become a quiet but powerful economic signal to brands and retailers.

Companies that invest in U.S. production aren’t just responding to federal incentives—they’re aligning with market trends and cultural expectations. And as inflation moderates and more efficient U.S. production ramps up, the price gap is shrinking, making Made in USA a more accessible choice for everyday consumers.

The Made in USA movement is no longer niche—it’s mainstream. From Gen Z TikTok trends to Wall Street investor reports, consumer preference is pushing American-made from the margins to the middle of the market. For companies, reshoring is becoming a brand asset. For the country, it’s a statement of shared values.

The Reshoring Opportunity

America stands at a pivotal moment in its industrial story. For decades, offshoring hollowed out communities, weakened national resilience, and left supply chains vulnerable to disruption and geopolitical risk. But today, that tide is turning.

The reshoring movement is no longer a theory—it’s a reality. Fueled by federal and state policy, corporate rethinking, public demand, and technological innovation, American manufacturing is returning home in ways not seen in a generation.

We’ve seen the data: hundreds of thousands of new jobs, billions in domestic investment, and new factories rising across the Midwest, South, and Southwest. We’ve tracked the policies—from the CHIPS Act to Buy American—to the companies responding, from Intel to Ford. We’ve witnessed a cultural shift, as consumers and young people prioritize transparency, resilience, and national pride.

And yet, this momentum is fragile.

Labor shortages, permitting delays, cost pressures, and policy uncertainty remain formidable obstacles. Without a deliberate, long-term strategy, the reshoring movement could plateau—or worse, unravel under the weight of short-term politics or global pressures.

The choice is clear. We can treat reshoring as a moment, or we can commit to it as a mission.

That means:

Investing in a skilled industrial workforce
Building out regional supply chains
Streamlining regulations and infrastructure
Maintaining consistent, bipartisan support for domestic manufacturing

If we do, we won’t just bring back jobs—we’ll rebuild economic sovereignty, restore trust in American products, and lay the foundation for a more stable, secure, and self-reliant future.

Reshoring is not just an economic shift. It’s a national revival. The question now is whether we sustain the momentum—or let it slip away.

The future of American manufacturing is being written now. Let’s make it a story worth telling.

References

Bain & Company. Businesses Accelerate Reshoring and Near-Shoring Amid Heightened Geopolitical Uncertainties and Rising Costs, Bain & Company Finds. Bain & Company, 14 Nov. 2024, https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/2024/businesses-accelerate-reshoring-and-near-shoring-amid-heightened-geopolitical-uncertainties-and-rising-costs-bain–company-finds/.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Winning the Battery Race: How the United States Can Leapfrog China to Dominate Next-Generation Battery Technologies. Oct. 2024, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/10/winning-the-battery-race-how-the-united-states-can-leapfrog-china-to-dominate-next-generation-battery-technologies.

Chemical & Engineering News. The Unfulfilled Dream of Drug Reshoring. 30 Sept. 2024, https://cen.acs.org/business/outsourcing/unfulfilled-dream-drug-reshoring/102/i30.

Industry Week. Full-Year 2023 Jobs Report Shows Slow Year-Over-Year Manufacturing Growth. 2024, https://www.industryweek.com/talent/article/21282112/full-year-2023-jobs-report-shows-slow-year-over-year-manufacturing-growth.

Kearney. Made in America: Here to Stay? 2023, https://www.kearney.com/service/operations-performance/us-reshoring-index.

Lexology. The Return of Manufacturing: North America’s Reshoring Movement. Oct. 2024, https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=710da602-692e-4885-bf40-510907628912.

MIT Sloan Management Review. A Reshoring Renaissance Is Underway. 2023, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/a-reshoring-renaissance-is-underway/.

National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). Facts About Manufacturing – NAM. 2024, https://nam.org/mfgdata/facts-about-manufacturing-expanded/.

Reshoring Initiative. Reshoring Initiative® 2023 Annual Report. 2024, https://reshorenow.org/content/pdf/Reshoring_Initiative_2023_Annual_Report.pdf.

—. Reshoring Initiative 1H 2023 Report. 2023, https://reshorenow.org/content/pdf/1H2023_RI_Report.pdf.

—. Reshoring Initiative 2023 Q1 Data Report. 2023, https://reshorenow.org/content/pdf/2023_Q1_data_report.pdf.

—. Companies Reshoring. 2023, https://reshorenow.org/companies-reshoring/.

Reuters. Why a Major Shift to U.S. Clothing Production Is Unlikely. 13 Mar. 2025, https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/why-major-shift-us-clothing-production-is-unlikely-2025-03-13/.

RBC Capital Markets. A New Wave of Reshoring for US Manufacturers. July 2023, https://www.rbccm.com/en/story/story.page?dcr=templatedata/article/story/data/2023/07/a-new-wave-of-reshoring-for-us-manufacturers.

The Defense Department. DOD Looks to Establish ‘Mine-to-Magnet’ Supply Chain for Rare Earth Materials. 2024, https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3700059/dod-looks-to-establish-mine-to-magnet-supply-chain-for-rare-earth-materials.

The Reshoring Initiative. Reshoring Initiative Annual Report: 287,000 Jobs Announced. 2024, https://www.amtonline.org/article/reshoring-initiative-annual-report-287-000-jobs-announced.

The World Economic Forum. What is ‘Friendshoring’? This and Other Global Trade Buzzwords Explained. Feb. 2023, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/02/friendshoring-global-trade-buzzwords/.

TSMC. TSMC Announces Updates for TSMC Arizona. Dec. 2022, https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/2977.

U.S. Department of Commerce. Biden-Harris Administration Announces Preliminary Terms with Micron to Onshore Leading-Edge Memory Chip Production in U.S. for First Time in Decades. Apr. 2024, https://www.commerce.gov/news/press-releases/2024/04/biden-harris-administration-announces-preliminary-terms-micron-onshore.